Showing posts with label Hindi movie 2024. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hindi movie 2024. Show all posts

FIGHTER Hindi full movie 2024

FIGHTER Hindi full movie 2024




Director:Siddharth Anand

Writer:Siddharth Anand,Roman Chibb, Abbas Dalal

Stars:Hrithik Roshan,Deepika Padukone,Anil Kapoor

FIGHTER Hindi full movie 2024 Review



India's best combat aviators join forces to form Air Dragons at Srinagar Airbase in attempt to deny their notorious neighbor Pakistan who along with a terrorist group are planning yet another attack on Indian military bases.
Loved the movie, the characters, the comradery and stirring patriotic feelings. Loved it all. Watched it in Sydney and the crowd was clapping. Reading the reviews here, it looks like the Indian Gen Z is all about soft porn, hook-ups, drugs and petty criminal stories, loving Animal and Pathaan, but hating this. Crazy! This movie is definitely better than any other Hindi movies I have watched recently.
The story aims to mix the Defence eco-system, the discipline, the hard-nosed fighters and a war again what is essentially a terrorist nation, and the Indian Bollywood cultural theme of romance, parents etc., which is beautiful. I think Indian audience has gotten addicted to the dose of cheap humor, vulgarity, graphic violence and objectifying women.

Can't remember the last time I watched a Bollywood movie that focused solely on Indian Air Force. This Siddharth Anand's film surely falls in that category.
Visual effects in this movie are above Bollywood standards with scenes of Sukhoi and Dhruv flying are treat to watch.
Casting team too did their part as one cannot think of anyone better than Hrithik and Deepika leading a pack of Aviators.
Surely a must watch that too in theater.
Fighter's sky battles soar as stunning, balletic marvels. Hritik Roshan embodies the gritty pilot, while Deepika Padukone brings fiery charisma.
Their banter sparks laughter that deepens their bond, but the story hits turbulence in the second half, with predictable twists grounding you.
Despite the narrative dip, Fighter's visuals take flight, and the impactful action packs a punch. Buckle up for a thrilling ride, but be prepared for some turbulence.


Songs are amazing and Dance of Hritik Roshan is amazing.
Music is good, locations are well selected. Flow of story is really good and near to a real story.
May be if the movie came 5 years ago might be really good. But after watching uri and other really good armed forces movie , man this movie just average . Acting was good and photography was good to but not that much on story .little sloppy on screenplay . Except for the first song rest of them were really misplaced . Even if they removed the songs wouldn't bad. Hrithik was good and did hold up his own , but might not be right role for him. Rest of cast did good and were apt . Villan was good looking but man had a single line dialogue. Should have more . One time watch that too if you hardcore fan of Hrithik .
Fighter helmed by Sidharth Anand and featuring a stellar cast including Hrithik Roshan, Deepika Padukone, and Anil Kapoor, unfortunately, falls into a myriad of pitfalls that collectively diminish the film's overall impact. The most glaring issue is the excessive use of slow-motion shots, which not only overwhelms the viewer but also detracts from the storytelling. The repetitive nature of these sequences becomes a veritable headache, diluting the potential impact of pivotal moments.
While the star power of the cast is undeniable, the film's visual effects leave much to be desired. The CGI elements lack the finesse expected in contemporary cinema, diminishing the overall cinematic experience. Furthermore, the inclusion of songs seems more like a gratuitous platform for Deepika Padukone's dance performances rather than serving a purpose within the narrative, contributing to a disjointed viewing experience.
The inclusion of songs in the movie felt forced and unnecessary. While music can undoubtedly elevate a film, in "Fighter," it appeared more like a platform for Deepika Padukone to showcase her dance skills than an integral part of the storytelling. This diversion from the plot not only disrupted the flow but also left me questioning the purpose of these musical interludes.

A notable drawback is the film's length, and this issue could have been mitigated by a judicious removal of the superfluous slow-motion shots. Trimming the runtime would not only enhance the pacing but also potentially salvage the film's narrative cohesion.

The dog-fight scenes, crucial in a film of this genre, disappoint with their lackluster execution. The fighter plane's appearance verges on the cartoonish, compromising the realism necessary for such intense sequences. This, unfortunately, positions "Fighter" as a pale imitation rather than a worthy contender in the action-thriller genre.
Comparisons with Ajay Devgn's "Runway 34" further amplify the film's shortcomings. Despite a potentially smaller budget, "Runway 34" managed to deliver a more engaging and commendable cinematic experience. The discrepancy raises questions about the directorial choices made in "Fighter," leaving audiences longing for a more polished and well-thought-out production.
In conclusion, "Fighter" struggles to soar to the heights anticipated from a film of this caliber. Sidharth Anand's vision, marred by a lack of restraint in certain aspects, results in a movie that feels like a missed opportunity rather than the cinematic triumph it could have been.

Great interval episode which lasted about 30 minutes. Great aviation scenes. Very rarely we see such scenes in Indian movies. Hrithik's screen presence is as usual great. He suited the part. As far as the authentic Indian Navy's portrayal on to the screen is concerned, they did their best. That's all is what I can think about what worked for me in the movie.
Everything else is just decently packed and never impressed me in any sorts. The story itself is thin and predictable. A lot more writing is needed to make a solid movie. The love track was meh. Unnecessary and stretched. No proper character arc for Anil Kapoor. He hates Hrithik, dances with him, again hates him, and again loves him.
Nothing really happened in the first hour of the first half and the first 30 minutes of the second half. Whatever happened in the last 45 minutes was boring / predictable/ rushed.
I left the theater with a bit of disappointment. One would expect more from this combo, especially with Sid after War and Pathaan. Not a bad movie either.
I have seen all Siddharth's movies before this and can definitely say that this is not his best movie, before the intermission this movie feels absolutely kiddish with dialogues and poor screenplay. Anil Kapoor's acting is the best part in movie, everyone else seems fine. The patriotism in this movie seems very fake and if you have seen top gun movie then you will not feel anything special. Last 25 mins action is really best in movie other than this you will feel bore while listening lecture from Ashutosh Rana and Deepika you will feel what the hell is going on. Don't expect too much from movie and if you have seen top gun then better to avoid.
I am surprised a crew as stellar as this would come together for something as average as this. It contains so, so many cliché plots, over dramatization that really does not fit the narration directions. I watch every Hrithik movie because he is a fantastic actor. This was pretty average barring some great action scenes in the better half of the movie.
May contain mild spoilers below*
The plot's centric towards an over abused topic in the industry unfortunately and relies solely on action scenes and the fitting of multiple repeated storylines to fit into one narration. It is hopefully fairly easy for everyone to guess what happens next in pretty much every scene.
It's like you've heard these 20 songs for a long time and someone released a new song with rhythms borrowed from all of them together to fit into one song with a normal average length. Is the problem that it borrows ideas from multiple narrations or is it the fact that each one of those narrations itself is mainstream meaning it would be borrowed already?



Land of Bad full hindi movie( 2024)

Land of Bad full hindi movie( 2024)



Director:William Eubank.

Writer:David Frigerio,William  Eubank.

Stars:Laim Hemsworth,Russell Crowe,Luke Hemsworth.

Land of Bad full hindi movie( 2024) Review




This film isn't going to win any Oscars or be nominated by any stretch of the imagination but it's a solid action flick. It'saninteresting take on a military action movie where the drone operator (Crowe) can be the difference between life and death for an American team behind enemy lines. Of course some Hollywood magic carries the movie through scenes that wouldn't otherwise happen in real life but that's to be expected.


Crowe does a great job as an aging drone operator who should be higher in rank by now but is held back by his own stubbornness. Without Crowe in this role I think the movie would fall far under the radar (pun intended) of most people looking for a decent action movie to watch. Hemsworth does a decent job in his role but it's Crowe that holds the film together. Worth a watch.
This movie is a kind of a blast from the past, when action movies like "Commando" or "Missing in Action" ruled the VHS rental stores. It has absolutely everything that fans of adult cinema appreciate and value - shootouts, swear words in the dialogues, simple motivations and quite good execution.
Liam Hemsworth may not be the king of acting, but he delivers a sufficiently interesting role to follow his fate with excitement on face. For me, it was a pleasant screening, although it lacks some clear and positive argument. It is a solid action movie in a modern edition, but without unnecessary corporate influences. It is worth watching, because such productions are basically not produced today.
A surprisingly entertaining and enjoyable movie based on modern warfare.
I'm not usually a fan of war movies, but with a cast including Liam Hemsworth and Russell Crowe I gave it a chance, and I am glad I did.


It's your typical good guys vs bad guys movie, with the obligatory fighting, bombs and action which in general work quite well.
However this movie relies heavily on modern warfare tactics, with drones, eye in the sky, and missiles which adds something a little different
It seems like the type of movie that will come and go which is too bad because it was decent. Not the best I've ever seen but purely entertaining for what it was. Liam Hemsworth is starting to look more like his brother Chris in his old age. Possibly the one disadvantage to the film because you look at Liam and you think Chris in those Extraction movies but this movie is not on that level.Russel Crowe was amazing in this film. He did so much with so little. It was a part that felt like anyone could play but Crowe put on the acting muscles for this. I see why he's won an Oscar. He's not going to win one for this but he gave a charming performance that made the non-action parts more interesting Yeah man, truly sorry that this movie seems to be designed to go straight to the streaming services after a courtesy release. Never even heard about it just saw it pop up on my movie theatre app very suddenly when I wanted something to watch.
The Land of Bad follows a.special ops rescue mission to its conclusion. The tone and feel of the movie is reminiscent of Sicario and Top Gun: Maverick. The story is good with some unexpected twists, thrills, and lessons.

All of the actors do a great job but Russell Crowe steals the screen through the character 'Reaper,' a civilian contractor working as a drone operator. Reaper cares deeply about his job and takes the mission seriously. The team in the field is his number one priority and that's what makes Reaper so darn likable.

All in all the action looked and felt great but that's not what makes Land of Bad a good movie. In fact, I wouldn't even call Land of Bad an action flick. At its heart, Land of Bad is drama about the difficulties surrounding modern combat and its effect on our psyche.

Don't get me wrong. It's not an Oscar winner or anything but it's a serious and entertaining movie that I enjoyed enough to write this review.


When you first saw this film on a list of movies to watch on a...non reputable website for movies...I thought it was a Netflix or Amazon flick because I've never heard of it before, let alone seen a trailer. Here I come to find out that this movie was not only released in theaters but it was released TWO DAYS AGO 2024. The marketing team completely dropped the ball on this movie. The major reason that I believe it failed is because there was zero reaching out to potential audiences.


This movie has your basic covert jungle style warfare with enemies who can't aim but it kept me entertained and into it the entire time. The acting is decent, and Russell Crowe is great as an 'in your ear drone operator'. The way they used technical equipment in this movie is better than I've seen of late in any modern movie with drone warfare.

If you want to see a jungle shooting movie with American good guys shooting at random bad guys then this movie is for you. It's very entertaining and I felt into it the entire time.

Someone should have warned them 'Land of Bad' is a marketing disaster as a title for a movie. There is no way I'm going to remember the movie by this title.

'Land of Bad' offers nothing original. We've seen this premise so many times before and chances are you're going to watch it for the action and not so much the story. A Delta Force team is sent to the Philippines to extract a CIA agent (whom we never get to see). Kinney (Liam Hemsworth) - also known as Playboy - is mistakenly assigned to the operation, and - as predicted - becomes the protagonist.

When the extraction goes horribly wrong, the team relies on drone operator 'Reaper' (Russell Crowe) to be their eyes and guide them to safety. 'Land of Bad' is a no-holds-barred actioner with action and adventure from beginning to end. There are a few very good action sequences and even well crafted suspense. I do think the film's final moments could have been better, but in general I rather enjoyed 'Land of Bad' - even if just for the action and to see those ripped bodies in action.

Crakk Jeetega... Toh Jiyegaa (2024) Full movie

Crakk Jeetega... Toh Jiyegaa (2024) Full movie






Director:Adity Datt

Writer:Adity Datt,Rehan khan ,Sarim Momin

Stars:Vidtut,Jammawal,Arjun Rampal,Nora Fatehi

Crakk Jeetega... Toh Jiyegaa (2024) Review

Review: Crackk (2024)

Crackk offers a rollercoaster of action-packed sequences, showcasing innovative concepts rarely seen in Bollywood. The camera work deserves applause for capturing the adrenaline-fueled moments with perfection. Among the four action sequences, the long-awaited showdown between Arjun and Vidyut in the climax stands out, delivering a thrilling experience.


However, the film isn't without its flaws. Vidyut's accent, haircut, and dressing style may be distracting, accompanied by subpar acting. Despite being a favorite, Amy Jackson's role falls flat, while Arjun Rampal shines with his usual brilliance in both acting prowess and looks. Bijoy Anand delivers commendable performance, but the repetitive ghostly appearances of Ankit Mohan become tiresome. Nora Fatehi's portrayal is average at best.

The first half of the film could have been tighter, enhancing the overall pacing and engagement. Nevertheless, Crackk remains a worthwhile watch primarily due to its high-octane action sequences. If you're a fan of adrenaline-pumping thrills, this movie won't disappoint.



I recently watched the movie,
and I have to say it left me with mixed feelings. The acting was decent, nothing extraordinary but not terrible either. I'd rate it around a 6 out of 10.

Now, the music and sound effects really stood out to me. They were so well done, really added depth to the scenes, and kept me engaged throughout. You feel it throughout the sorry. Plus there were no unnecessary typical Bollywood songs. Solid 10 out of 10 there.

As for the action, it was good, kept the adrenaline pumping, but it didn't blow me away. I'd say it's about a 7 out of 10. The story was fine, definitely different from what I expected, which was a nice surprise. However, there were moments where it felt a bit cluttered with unnecessary subplots. I'd give the story a 6 out of 10.

On the visual side, the cinematography was impressive. The scenes were beautifully shot, capturing the essence of the story. The movie felt sped up a bit, I'd rate it around an 7 out of 10.

Overall, I'd say the movie was alright. It had its highs and lows, but it's worth a watch if you're into something a bit different than your usual bollywood movies.


Crakk is a slick, entertaining, high on adrenaline action flick with some great stunt work and action sequences. It has a great villain in Arjun Rampal and a real martial arts action star in Vidyut Jamwal and they both do a pretty decent job in their respective roles. The premise of the movie which takes inspiration from dystopian action movies like The Condemned, Death Race, Running Man, Mad Max: Fury Road etc is pretty decent. It mixes action, revenge and crime thriller sub-genres very well. The movie is overall technically pretty sound for an action movie with good stunts, VFX, cinematography, editing but it unfortunately also struggles with poor dialog writing and its side characters.

The movie is good fun but drags a bit at certain points and would have benefited from a shorter run time. Nora and Amy Jackson are both nice to look at but dont excite as much with their acting skills. The songs are also a distraction for the genre and were not required. Focus on Vidyut and the crakking action without these distractions would have elevated the movie.

Vidyut is doing a decent job of creating his own niche brand of a solid action genre in Bollywood similar to the likes of Martial Artist stars like Chuck Norris, Van Damme, Steven Seagal and others. Crakk is an action packed entry in the right direction to solidify Vidyut's brand and image. It is a good and ambitious action movie but isn't good enough to make him as bankable an action star as his idols at the moment. It is still a pretty fun action flick.

Crackk offers a rollercoaster of action-packed sequences, showcasing innovative concepts rarely seen in Bollywood. The camera work deserves applause for capturing the adrenaline-fueled moments with perfection. Among the four action sequences, the long-awaited showdown between Arjun and Vidyut in the climax stands out, delivering a thrilling experience.

However, the film isn't without its flaws. Vidyut's accent, haircut, and dressing style may be distracting, accompanied by subpar acting. Despite being a favorite, Amy Jackson's role falls flat, while Arjun Rampal shines with his usual brilliance in both acting prowess and looks. Bijoy Anand delivers commendable performance, but the repetitive ghostly appearances of Ankit Mohan become tiresome. Nora Fatehi's portrayal is average at best.

The first half of the film could have been tighter, enhancing the overall pacing and engagement. Nevertheless, Crackk remains a worthwhile watch primarily due to its high-octane action sequences. If you're a fan of adrenaline-pumping thrills, this movie won't disappoint.

Apurva hindi movie 2024 watch online

Apurva hindi movie 2024  watch online 




 Director:Nikhil Nagesh Bat

Writer:Nikhil Nagesh Bat

Stars:Tara Sutaria,Rajpal Naurang Yadav,Abhishek Banerje.

Apurva hindi movie  Revie

Apurva is a senseless film that hardly merits a review. It follows the clichéd formula of a predictable masala movie, with absurd plot elements. The protagonist, Tara Sutaria, effortlessly dispatching kidnappers one by one, reappearing mysteriously to lure and kill them, defies all logic. Another character's kidnapping serves only as a device for the protagonist to use a cellphone. Except for Rajpal Yadav's acting, the performances were mediocre. This movie is best avoided; I grew bored within 15 minutes, resorting to fast-forwarding to reach the end! Those who consider this as a good thriller should watch any of the 'Crime Patrol' episodes on Sony, a much better option to kill time.


In Chambal, a group of four hoodlums: Jugnu (Rajpal Yadav), Sukha (Abhishek Banerjee), Balli (Sumit Gulati), and Chota (Aditya Gupta) loot people and kill them. While overtaking a luxury bus, Jugnu is abused by a driver, and then he stops the bus, shoots the driver, and kills the conductor/cleaner. Sukha and Balli enter the bus and start looting jewellery and clothes from passengers, and one of them is Apurva (Tara Sutaria). Apurva is receiving a call from her boyfriend, Sid (Dhairya Karwa), who speaks badly to Sukha over the call. To seek revenge and be all lusty over Apurva's beauty, Sukha and his gang members kidnap her and take her to a deserted place. The four of them plan to rape Apurva and then kill her the next day. Will Apurva's brave efforts be enough to find an escape from these four violent and ruthless people?

Nikhil Nagesh Bhat's Apurva is fine story to pick up for a thrilling and intense ride, but like I said, this genre needs a sharp screenplay. Apurva is far from that. It's not sharp, and that's okay, but it's too thin and blurry. The screenplay is scattered, and that's why the entire build-up collapses on the ground. A girl cannot run away despite having so many opportunities; she can see through a brick wall, but not run away; she can find a hideout at the same place instead; she even knows where the car is parked; she can use a weapon whenever she wants and it can disappear as per situations; the fellas with guns will not shoot the girl; one slap is enough to make a girl highly unconscious, but several falls can still leave enough power for her to run; a man can be alive even after falling into a deep well, but one rock hit is enough to make him quite and how Apurva did it, don't ask; the man with injured legs can catch up with the car and then suddenly lie down and beg for his life on the railroad. There are so many illogical movements, and nothing actually grips you. That's where Apurva falls, and it falls flat. It doesn't matter how many positive points the film has; the screenplay is so messy that it doesn't give the film any chance to recover.


Since her debut, Tara Sutaria has always been a hero's heroine, who would do romance, grand makeup, glamorous outfits, and sweet talk. With Apurva, she finally enters the "actor's" zone, and HOW! In the first scene and flashback romance, she is the same Tara you have seen in previous films. But she had to look beautiful so that the physical transformation would make more sense. It works. This is her best performance so far, and I think she should continue doing such meaty roles where people would be more attracted to her acting than just her beautiful face. Abhishek Banerjee is solid again, and this was a tailor-made role for him. He fits so well into everything. Rajpal Yadav is another great performer here, despite having fewer dialogues. This man has been so underrated for years, and all people remember of him is comedy. Please be sensible; he is way bigger and better than that. Sumit Gulati's accent is fantastic, Aditya Gupta looked fine, and Dhairya Karwa is decent in his supporting role.

Another good thing about Apurva is its cinematography. Anshuman Mahaley gets all the credit for that. Still, I think a few scenes could have been shot in a better way. For instance, in that well scene, when Tara is running, she slips suddenly and realises that there is a well at her feet. The camera takes it from her feet; instead, it should have started from the deep well, in the dark, and then come to the surface. The surprise element would have worked better this way, in my opinion. The music and background score are forgettable. The editing is tight as the film doesn't have a long runtime and doesn't have any loo breaks apart from that at one romantic song. Nikhil Nagesh Bhat's direction is very notable in some scenes. Apurva and Chota crawl on the floor, all in mud, and then she hits him hard-such a raw presentation of the situation. Apurva's marking system and hideouts also seemed very smart; only that they were predictable but very well presented on the screen. It's the screenplay that fails to live up to the standards of direction, acting, and storyline. It's good that the film is coming on OTT since the subject hardly had any appeal for big-screen audiences. As a whole, Apurva is a promising film and could have been a much better film, but the screenplay doesn't fit right here. Yet, you can watch it for the good performances by Tara Sutaria, Rajpal Yadav, and Abhishek Banerjee.